Jay Keating’s World Weblog

Politics, Conservation, News and Miscellaneous Thoughts

Free Speech 3, Canadian Islamic Congress 0 October 13, 2008

Filed under: Islam, Muslim, News, Political History — jaykeating @ 3:56 pm
Islamist Watch
Home |   Articles |   Blog |   About

by David J. Rusin
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 at 11:02 AM

http://www.islamist-watch.org/blog/2008/10/free-speech-3-canadian-islamic-congress-0.html

Send RSS Share:

After a weeklong hearing in June and months of deliberation, a human rights court announced Friday that a venerable Canadian newsweekly will not be sanctioned for publishing a piece by Mark Steyn that at least one Muslim lobby group had failed to enjoy:

Maclean’s magazine has won a human rights complaint filed against it over an article that the Canadian Islamic Congress claimed incited hatred against Muslims.

In a ruling released yesterday, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal rejected the complaint that the 2006 article violated Canada’s anti-hate laws.

The article is an excerpt of America Alone, which considers the impact that growing Muslim populations may have on the West. The victory was the third for Maclean’s this year. Previous Islamic Congress complaints in Ontario and at the federal level had already been dismissed.

Yet Steyn was not in a celebrating mood, as he believes that a lesser-known author would have been convicted, like many times before: “Life was chugging along just fine, chastising non-entities nobody had ever heard about,” he said. “Once they got the glare of publicity from the Maclean’s case, the kangaroos decided to jump for the exit.” He may have a point, given that the equally high-profile suit against Ezra Levant was tossed out by an Alberta panel in August.

Steyn’s disillusion was shared by Maclean’s columnist Andrew Coyne. In a blog post that begins, “Aw nuts, we won,” he notes:

It is no victory to be told by a shadowy government agency that you will be permitted to publish. This ruling … also prevents Maclean’s from appealing the tribunal’s decision to an actual court, wherein it might have had the relevant section of the B.C. human rights laws thrown out on constitutional grounds. (Or does it? Can you appeal when you win?)

Writing at Pajamas Media, Kathy Shaidle nicely captures the insanity:

I wouldn’t put it past the Canadian Islamic Congress to scold the B.C. tribunal for issuing its judgment on Friday, the Muslim holy day — and adding that to their list of grievances, in their virtually inevitable appeal.

And if they do appeal, the freedom of Canadians will once again be victimized by their 1970s-era leaders, who, in the words of Shaidle, set up these courts to “silence citizens who declined to embrace the new vision of Canada being foisted upon them by then-Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau: multicultural, pacifist, and militantly tolerant.”

With the Human Rights Commissions having endured multiple blows, now is the time for Canadians to be militantly intolerant of quasi-judicial bodies designed to abridge their rights.

Technorati Tags:

 

Airlines could save $10 billion a year with GPS October 13, 2008

Filed under: News — jaykeating @ 3:53 pm

A World War II-era air traffic network that often forces planes to take longer, zigzagging routes is costing U.S. airlines billions of dollars in wasted fuel while an upgrade to a satellite-based system has languished in the planning stages for more than a decade.

read more | digg story

 

The Left’s Official News Service October 13, 2008

Filed under: Election 2008, News, Political History, The Heritage Foundation, election — jaykeating @ 2:09 pm
The Heritage Foundation
THE MORNING BELL
MONDAY, OCT. 13, 2008

The Left’s Official News Service

The left is beginning to realize that its credibility on economic matters has been seriously compromised by its 40-year relationship with the government mortgage financing duopoly Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Witness Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) lying on HBO’s “Real Time” about how much money she accepted from the two mortgage giants. Enter McClatchy’s David Glodstein and Kevin Hall. McClatchy operates 32 daily newspapers in 29 markets, with a total circulation of 3.3 million. There are few better outlets through which one can propagate leftist lies.

Goldstein and Hall have written an article , “Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis,” which is a masterpiece in half-truths and opinion journalism disguised as hard news. Goldstein and Hill cite “Federal Reserve Board data” that show “More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions.” This are the first and most prominent example Goldstein and Hill use to support their thesis. It is also completely irrelevant. As Goldstein and Hill later admit much later in their own article, Freddie and Fannie “don’t lend money, to minorities or anyone else.” Exactly. So the fact that 84% of subprime loans were made by private institutions is completely irrelevant. So why is it the first “fact” Goldstein and Hill cite?

Goldstein and Hill then describe a little of what else Fannie and Freddie do in the real estate market: “They purchase loans from the private lenders who actually underwrite the loans. It’s a process called securitization, and by passing on the loans, banks have more capital on hand so they can lend even more.” Goldstein and Hall then begin to try and absolve Fannie and Freddie from their role in the subprime mess. They write: “Between 2004 and 2006, when subprime lending was exploding, Fannie and Freddie went from holding a high of 48 percent of the subprime loans that were sold into the secondary market to holding about 24 percent. … During those same explosive three years, private investment banks — not Fannie and Freddie — dominated the mortgage loans that were packaged and sold into the secondary mortgage market. In 2005 and 2006, the private sector securitized almost two thirds of all U.S. mortgages, supplanting Fannie and Freddie.”

So, according to Goldstein and Hill, Fannie and Freddie are innocent in the subprime mess because it was private banks that securitized most subprime loans during the height of the boom. But this Disney version of the truth leaves one huge question unanswered: Who bought all those subprime securities from the investment banks who were securitizing them? You will not learn this in Goldstein and Hill’s hackjob, but according to the Washington Post, at the height of the subprime boom Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac purchased 44% of the entire subprime security market.

Remember what Goldstein and Hill mentioned earlier: “It’s a process called securitization, and by passing on the loans, banks have more capital on hand so they can lend even more.” In other words, every government subsidized dime that Fannie and Freddie spent buying up subprime securities is another dime private banks had to make bad subprime loans. Countrywide Financial was among the biggest players in the subprime market. It has lost $2.5 billion in just the past year and has another $6 billion in nonperforming assets on its books. Fannie Mae was Countrywide’s biggest customer . This means that, through Fannie and Freddie, you the taxpayer helped subsidize Countrywide’s subprime loan underwriting.

Fannie and Freddie played a primary role in creating our current financial crisis. Just ask Warren Buffet and George Soros. Despite these facts, politicians on the left such as Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) want to preserve Fannie and Freddie in their current form. The U.S. economy cannot afford their continued existence, and dishonest “journalism” from the likes of Goldstein and Hill only provide cover for the left’s crony capitalism. Check this list of McClatchy owned newspapers. If you’re local paper is on the list, write McClatchy and demand the truth is added to Goldstein and Hill’s story.

Technorati Tags: ,

 

Why Doesn’t McCain Fight Back? October 13, 2008

Filed under: Election 2008, News, Political History, election — jaykeating @ 1:59 pm

Why Doesn’t McCain Fight Back?

AIM Column |  By Cliff Kincaid  |  October 12, 2008

Even the McCain campaign’s belated attacks on Obama associate Ayers are missing the mark.

The headline over Harold Ford Jr.’s Washington Post column was, “Will McCain Do Anything to Win?” The former Democratic congressman, who lost a bitter race for senator in Tennessee, insisted that McCain was attacking Obama “in harsh, personal terms” and smearing him. But this is patently absurd. Indeed, on page 8 of the same edition of the Post was a story headlined, “McCain Mum on former Pastor,” on how the Republican presidential candidate has avoided mentioning Obama’s spiritual adviser for 20 years―the racist anti-American preacher Rev. Jeremiah Wright, who believes Soviet disinformation that the U.S. Government manufactured the AIDS virus to kill black people.

Read more at AIM:  http://www.aim.org/aim-column/why-doesnt-mccain-fight-back/

Technorati Tags: , ,

 

Chicagoans Against Obama – Acorn October 13, 2008

Filed under: Election 2008, News, Political History, election — jaykeating @ 1:18 pm

EXCUSE ME MISS…..IS THAT AN ACORN ON YOUR SHIRT, OR

ARE YOU JUST HAPPY TO SEE ME?….

Posted in obama with tags , , , , on October 10, 2008 by Ray

While the Obama campaign continues to deny their candidates involvement with ACORN…..

Pictures like this don’t help their argument…

From what I can see in this pic….either Barry is working with ACORN…or, alternatively, he is hanging out with perverted old women who wear phallic shaped images on their red t-shirts….

you be the judge….

Read more at: http://chicagoagainstobama.wordpress.com/

Technorati Tags:

 

Berlin Announces World’s Largest Electric Car Infrastructure October 13, 2008

Filed under: News — jaykeating @ 11:38 am

Electricity provider RWE will install 500 power-points, where electric cars can charge up. Daimler AG and Smart are partnering in the project, which aims to have100 electric Smart Cars on the streets of Berlin by the end of 2009.

read more | digg story